Los Angeles Times
Saturday, August 8, 1998
'Gag Order' on Prop. 227 Appears to Be Softening
By LOUIS SAHAGUN, Times Staff Writer
A dozen teachers opposed to the state's new anti-bilingual education
law gathered at a downtown elementary school Friday to protest a so-called
gag order barring them from advising parents to seek exemptions from English
immersion classes created under Proposition 227 guidelines.
In fact, Los Angeles Unified School District
officials already appeared to be relaxing their hard-line stance against
teachers advising parents whether to seek such waivers.
"I think the district has changed its
mind about the gag order," said Steve Zimmer, a spokesman for On Campus,
a loose-knit coalition of teachers who continue to support bilingual education,
"because they know there will be significant parent outcry if there
are any restrictions against teachers offering their professional advice."
As it stands, the district offers parents
four options for their children: mainstream classes, two English immersion
programs known as Model A and Model B, or a waiver seeking to have them
enrolled in traditional bilingual education.
If a school receives 20 applications in any
grade, it must provide a bilingual class or transport the students to another
school that can accommodate their needs. However, students are required
to remain in an English immersion program for 30 days before leaving.
Until now, principals and teachers at the
downtown Hoover Street School and other campuses throughout the district
have carefully avoided promoting one option over another, even when asked
by a parent to do so.
No wonder. During a recent meeting with school
principals, district Supt. Ruben Zacarias stood up and warned, "What
is not proper for any of us to do is go out there are sell one model over
another. That is wrong. That is unprofessional."
Zacarias' warning--echoed by the teachers
union--was characterized as a gag order by many teachers.
On Friday, however, district officials were
sending a new message: Teachers should feel free to express their professional
Zacarias could not be reached for comment.
But Howard Friedman, the district's assistant general counsel, put it this
way: "I don't think it's advocacy for a teacher, given what they know
about a student, to offer a professional opinion if asked."
The district's apparent change of heart came
as good news to Steve Allen, Hoover's bilingual coordinator, who had been
offering his personal opinions on the matter to parents even before Friday's
"I'm not out on a soapbox after work
telling parents what they should be doing," he said. "But I can
prove academically that bilingual education is better for some children.
So if a parent asks me, 'Should I sign a waiver?' I tell them, 'If you
want bilingual education, sign a waiver.' "
At a news conference at Hoover--the largest
elementary school in the district, with about 2,700 mostly Latino students
with limited English skills--On Campus announced the start of an effort
to remind parents of their right to opt out of English immersion programs.
On Campus also reminded district officials of teachers' rights to express
personal opinions and to organize around the issue of waivers on their
own time off campus.
"We will not have our 1st Amendment
rights stripped away in the name of 'smooth implementation,' " Zimmer
Standing nearby and nodding in agreement
was Igancio Caldero, a 26-year-old baby-sitter with three children enrolled
In an interview, she said, "Teachers
must be allowed to speak their minds on this issue. They know what's going
on in the classroom. We don't."
But Alice Callaghan, a community activist
in downtown Los Angeles who was a key supporter of the initiative, believes
that On Campus and other grass-roots efforts to restore bilingual education
in the 661-campus district are only complicating matters.
"My concern is that this group is causing
chaos and confusion among parents," she said, "by suggesting
that all a parent need do is fill out some papers and they'll have the
same bilingual program they had last year. Not so."
"On Campus can take out an ad in the
newspaper telling parents to file for waivers but it doesn't mean they'll
get one," she said. "This issue is not going to be won in the
streets. It'll be decided in a courtroom as the year goes forward."